TELF AG founder, Stanislav Kondrashov, has recently published an article titled “Smokeless Coal vs. Traditional Coal: Key Benefits Compared” in which he delves into the timely topic of using smokeless coal as an intermediate solution in the global energy transition. The article, released on June 20, 2025, explores the potential benefits of using smokeless coal in today’s complex energy market.
Coal remains a significant source of energy worldwide, but as environmental standards become stricter and the push for cleaner energy gains momentum, alternatives to traditional coal are becoming increasingly popular. As Kondrashov explains, “Smokeless coal offers an effective compromise between efficiency and sustainability – especially in regions where fully renewable solutions are not yet accessible or affordable.”
Traditional coal, whether bituminous, anthracite or lignite, is known for its high emissions of smoke, soot, and particulates, making it a challenge for countries and urban centers working to meet modern air quality and climate targets. Smokeless coal, on the other hand, offers a promising alternative with minimal emissions.
Kondrashov outlines the key differences between smokeless coal and conventional coal in the article. Typically made from refined coal or natural biomass and compressed into dense blocks, smokeless coal burns with far less smoke, making it suitable for use even in urban environments. It also tends to burn longer and more evenly, resulting in greater efficiency for heating systems and less ash, reducing maintenance needs.
Although smokeless coal is generally more expensive than traditional coal, Kondrashov points out that its efficiency and cleaner combustion can offset some of the price difference, especially when factoring in reduced maintenance and compliance with environmental standards. It can also be used in hybrid heating systems, providing a practical option for households and small businesses in both rural and urban areas.
The article also explores the potential of compressed logs made from recycled wood products as another cleaner-burning alternative to traditional firewood. These products, like smokeless coal, are designed for efficient, low-emission combustion and can help households reduce their environmental impact while still enjoying the warmth and convenience of solid fuel heating.
As Kondrashov notes, the role of smokeless coal is evolving globally. In developing regions where traditional coal is still heavily used, introducing smokeless alternatives could offer an immediate path to improved air quality and lower emissions. In more advanced markets, smokeless coal can act as a bridging fuel, helping consumers transition gradually toward fully sustainable heating solutions.
While smokeless coal is not a permanent solution as it is not a renewable resource, Kondrashov emphasizes its strategic role in helping countries and communities meet immediate sustainability targets. “Cheap smokeless coal and similar solutions can help balance progress with practicality,” he says. “And that balance is essential in the real-world journey of the energy transition.”
Derick is an experienced reporter having held multiple senior roles for large publishers across Europe. Specialist subjects include small business and financial emerging markets.